<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A quote every, yes every theology student working on the Trinity or Incarnation should memorize (Dale)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trinities.org/blog/archives/666/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/666</link>
	<description>theories about the father, son, and holy spirit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:44:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT Paasch</title>
		<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/666/comment-page-1#comment-90425</link>
		<dc:creator>JT Paasch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trinities.org/blog/?p=666#comment-90425</guid>
		<description>Stones are dependent on God in that way too. And, transitively, relations are too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stones are dependent on God in that way too. And, transitively, relations are too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/666/comment-page-1#comment-90423</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 12:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trinities.org/blog/?p=666#comment-90423</guid>
		<description>Maybe somebody who thinks persons are essentially relational would claim that Adam&#039;s not being complete (somehow), meant that he wasn&#039;t fully personal until Eve was around. I&#039;m not persuaded by this, but I&#039;m sure somebody might say this.

What of a different sort of claim-- that is-- a human person that is essentially dependent on God for his/her existence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe somebody who thinks persons are essentially relational would claim that Adam&#8217;s not being complete (somehow), meant that he wasn&#8217;t fully personal until Eve was around. I&#8217;m not persuaded by this, but I&#8217;m sure somebody might say this.</p>
<p>What of a different sort of claim&#8211; that is&#8211; a human person that is essentially dependent on God for his/her existence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT Paasch</title>
		<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/666/comment-page-1#comment-90370</link>
		<dc:creator>JT Paasch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trinities.org/blog/?p=666#comment-90370</guid>
		<description>Not to mention that (for those who buy the Genesis narrative) Adam existed without Eve for a short bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention that (for those who buy the Genesis narrative) Adam existed without Eve for a short bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

