<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jesus and “God” &#8211; Part 8 &#8211; Some recent Jewish scholars on the biblical Shema (Dale)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trinities.org/blog/archives/553/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/553</link>
	<description>theories about the father, son, and holy spirit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:44:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: trinities - SCORING THE BURKE – BOWMAN DEBATE – Burke 1 (DALE)</title>
		<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/553/comment-page-1#comment-91891</link>
		<dc:creator>trinities - SCORING THE BURKE – BOWMAN DEBATE – Burke 1 (DALE)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trinities.org/blog/?p=553#comment-91891</guid>
		<description>[...] I think Dave goes to far when he asserts that Deut 6:4 features &#8220;explicit Unitarian language&#8221;, but I&#8217;ve posted on that before. (Again, here.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I think Dave goes to far when he asserts that Deut 6:4 features &#8220;explicit Unitarian language&#8221;, but I&#8217;ve posted on that before. (Again, here.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/553/comment-page-1#comment-91218</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trinities.org/blog/?p=553#comment-91218</guid>
		<description>FYI: The NRSV has &quot;the LORD alone&quot;. But, the Latin Vulgate has &quot;Dominus unus est&quot; (&quot;the LORD is one&quot;) and not something like &quot;Dominus solus est&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI: The NRSV has &#8220;the LORD alone&#8221;. But, the Latin Vulgate has &#8220;Dominus unus est&#8221; (&#8220;the LORD is one&#8221;) and not something like &#8220;Dominus solus est&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cabbala</title>
		<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/553/comment-page-1#comment-91216</link>
		<dc:creator>cabbala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 13:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trinities.org/blog/?p=553#comment-91216</guid>
		<description>Completely I share your opinion. I like your idea. I suggest to take out for the general discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely I share your opinion. I like your idea. I suggest to take out for the general discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trinities - Jesus and &#8220;God&#8221; - Part 6 - What did the Shema originally mean? (Dale)</title>
		<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/553/comment-page-1#comment-89452</link>
		<dc:creator>trinities - Jesus and &#8220;God&#8221; - Part 6 - What did the Shema originally mean? (Dale)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trinities.org/blog/?p=553#comment-89452</guid>
		<description>[...] Next time: Jewish scholars try to sort out the Shema. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Next time: Jewish scholars try to sort out the Shema. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

