<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linkage: banning &#8220;trinitarian&#8221; (Dale)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trinities.org/blog/archives/405/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/405</link>
	<description>theories about the father, son, and holy spirit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:44:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/405/comment-page-1#comment-89090</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trinities.org/blog/?p=405#comment-89090</guid>
		<description>Thanks, guys - just posted on what the OED says. May post again if I get my hands on that 17th c. source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, guys &#8211; just posted on what the OED says. May post again if I get my hands on that 17th c. source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trinities - Heretical &#8220;trinitarians&#8221; - evolution of a word (Dale)</title>
		<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/405/comment-page-1#comment-89088</link>
		<dc:creator>trinities - Heretical &#8220;trinitarians&#8221; - evolution of a word (Dale)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trinities.org/blog/?p=405#comment-89088</guid>
		<description>[...] up on the previous post - the word &#8220;trinitarian&#8221; may be an adjective or a noun. The Oxford English Dictionary [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up on the previous post &#8211; the word &#8220;trinitarian&#8221; may be an adjective or a noun. The Oxford English Dictionary [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/405/comment-page-1#comment-89073</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 13:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trinities.org/blog/?p=405#comment-89073</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve run across it once or twice; I didn&#039;t realize it was a general thing.

On the subject of Trinitarian humor, have you seen the &lt;a href=&quot;http://xkcd.com/459/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;most recent xkcd&lt;/a&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve run across it once or twice; I didn&#8217;t realize it was a general thing.</p>
<p>On the subject of Trinitarian humor, have you seen the <a href="http://xkcd.com/459/" rel="nofollow">most recent xkcd</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Myers</title>
		<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/405/comment-page-1#comment-89071</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 09:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trinities.org/blog/?p=405#comment-89071</guid>
		<description>Hi Dale. Sorry, your comment at my blog disappeared due to problems with Blogger. And I tried posting a reply, but that vanished too! So anyway, here&#039;s my quick reply:

I&#039;ve come across this early use of the term in my own reading of primary texts from the 16th and 17th centuries. But there&#039;s also a good entry on this in the OED, under &quot;Trinitarian&quot; (you&#039;ll need to consult the full version, not the Shorter Oxford). The OED traces the history of the word&#039;s use, with examples from the 16th and 17th centuries (where &quot;Trinitarians&quot; are heretics), and from the early 18th century (where the orthodox become the &quot;Trinitarians&quot;).

Hope that helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dale. Sorry, your comment at my blog disappeared due to problems with Blogger. And I tried posting a reply, but that vanished too! So anyway, here&#8217;s my quick reply:</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve come across this early use of the term in my own reading of primary texts from the 16th and 17th centuries. But there&#8217;s also a good entry on this in the OED, under &#8220;Trinitarian&#8221; (you&#8217;ll need to consult the full version, not the Shorter Oxford). The OED traces the history of the word&#8217;s use, with examples from the 16th and 17th centuries (where &#8220;Trinitarians&#8221; are heretics), and from the early 18th century (where the orthodox become the &#8220;Trinitarians&#8221;).</p>
<p>Hope that helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike K</title>
		<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/405/comment-page-1#comment-89068</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 03:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trinities.org/blog/?p=405#comment-89068</guid>
		<description>Interesting you asked about the pejorative label; I know I&#039;ve heard of it before, and it is peculiar if true.

Nonetheless, perhaps, Ben Myers and you can advance this 5-year ban for precisely the motivation advanced by Ben:
&lt;em&gt;...the use of the word “trinitarian” in much contemporary theology – as a generic slogan, applied willy-nilly on any occasion – has become an obstacle to real theological thinking.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting you asked about the pejorative label; I know I&#8217;ve heard of it before, and it is peculiar if true.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, perhaps, Ben Myers and you can advance this 5-year ban for precisely the motivation advanced by Ben:<br />
<em>&#8230;the use of the word “trinitarian” in much contemporary theology – as a generic slogan, applied willy-nilly on any occasion – has become an obstacle to real theological thinking.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

