<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jesus and &#8220;god&#8221; &#8211; part 5 &#8211; &#8220;gods&#8221; in the Bible (Dale)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trinities.org/blog/archives/357/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/357</link>
	<description>theories about the father, son, and holy spirit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:44:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: trinities - SCORING THE BURKE – BOWMAN DEBATE – Burke 2 (DALE)</title>
		<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/357/comment-page-1#comment-91947</link>
		<dc:creator>trinities - SCORING THE BURKE – BOWMAN DEBATE – Burke 2 (DALE)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trinities.org/blog/?p=357#comment-91947</guid>
		<description>[...] So many, not all, but many of the passages at issue involving Jesus &#8211; particularly the less disputable ones in Heb 1 and John 20, involve this &#8211; using &#8220;God&#8221; as a name or title for Jesus. The question, of course, is why is this done. What does this usage presuppose, or what is the best explanation of it? I don&#8217;t think Burke really suggests an explanation. I was expecting to see something about Jesus resembling God, which seems a central theme in Paul and John (e.g. exact image and likeness, etc, and  he who has seen me has seen the Father) This would merit a flag, except that Burke does point out that according Jesus himself, men may properly be referred to as &#8220;gods&#8221; (John 10), and that it is clear that sometimes in the OT various humans are called &#8220;god&#8221; or &#8220;gods&#8221;. (We&#8217;ve discussed this before.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So many, not all, but many of the passages at issue involving Jesus &#8211; particularly the less disputable ones in Heb 1 and John 20, involve this &#8211; using &#8220;God&#8221; as a name or title for Jesus. The question, of course, is why is this done. What does this usage presuppose, or what is the best explanation of it? I don&#8217;t think Burke really suggests an explanation. I was expecting to see something about Jesus resembling God, which seems a central theme in Paul and John (e.g. exact image and likeness, etc, and  he who has seen me has seen the Father) This would merit a flag, except that Burke does point out that according Jesus himself, men may properly be referred to as &#8220;gods&#8221; (John 10), and that it is clear that sometimes in the OT various humans are called &#8220;god&#8221; or &#8220;gods&#8221;. (We&#8217;ve discussed this before.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trinities - Jesus and &#8220;god&#8221; - part 4 - Time traveling among the &#8220;gods&#8221; (Dale)</title>
		<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/357/comment-page-1#comment-89418</link>
		<dc:creator>trinities - Jesus and &#8220;god&#8221; - part 4 - Time traveling among the &#8220;gods&#8221; (Dale)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 11:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trinities.org/blog/?p=357#comment-89418</guid>
		<description>[...] Next time: &#8220;gods&#8221; of the Bible.   Share: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Next time: &#8220;gods&#8221; of the Bible.   Share: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

