<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t think/write like a contemporary theologian &#8211; Part 3 &#8211;  tendencies (Dale)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trinities.org/blog/archives/356/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/356</link>
	<description>theories about the father, son, and holy spirit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:44:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Hart</title>
		<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/356/comment-page-1#comment-90449</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trinities.org/blog/?p=356#comment-90449</guid>
		<description>There seems another obvious sense in which a doctrine can have such a derivative tendency toward, say, modalism: it&#039;s a doctrine which sits most comfortably within a modalist theory of the Trinity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There seems another obvious sense in which a doctrine can have such a derivative tendency toward, say, modalism: it&#8217;s a doctrine which sits most comfortably within a modalist theory of the Trinity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

