Comments on: Jesus and “god” – part 1 (Dale)

By: trinities - Jesus and “god” - part 11 - Review and Conclusion (Dale)

trinities - Jesus and “god” - part 11 - Review and Conclusion (Dale) — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:23:59 +0000

[...] up this long in the tooth series with a summary, and a few extra thoughts along the way.In parts one and two, we laid out simple arguments that Christ is divine, or that he is the one God. Careful [...]

By: trinities - Jesus and “god” - part 5 - Jesus as “god” in the New Testament (Dale)

Wed, 01 Oct 2008 12:56:59 +0000

[...] does this have to do with evaluating the argument which we started this series, and refined in part 2? Here’s are two refined versions from [...]

By: trinities - Jesus and “god” - part 3 - analyzing “X is a god” (Dale)

Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:22:55 +0000

[...] this series, we first set out an important argument from Christian theology and apologetics about Jesus. In the second installment, we simplified the [...]

By: trinities - Jesus and “god” - part 2 - equivocation (Dale)

trinities - Jesus and “god” - part 2 - equivocation (Dale) — Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:07:36 +0000

[...] Last time we looked at a famous argument about Jesus. (If you’ve never had a course in logic, or if it’s been a while, you should review the linked definitions there of “valid”, “invalid”, and “sound” before proceeding – this discussion presupposes that you understand their meanings.) [...]