Brandon’s Siris blog has recently completed 6 years – it has surely outlived 99.9% of blogs, and is older than trinities, which is 4 this summer! Congrats, Brandon!
In a recent post Brandon takes issue with my recent appeal to the principle that “if every F is a G then there cannot be fewer Gs than Fs”.
Some Trinity theories are inconsistent with the (I think obviously true, self-evident) principle, notably the recent theory by Mike Rea, as well as the much-quoted “Athanasian” Creed. Brandon thinks I’m confused. I am confused, about how he thinks I’m confused. And probably about other things. 
Check out our discussion in the comments following Brandon’s post. (Comment there if you’re interested.)
One Response to “Linkage: Discussing Fs and Gs with Brandon (Dale)”
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Loading ...
[...] insists that there is only one Lord. As some philosophers have pointed out, it is self-evident that if every F is a G, then there can’t be fewer Gs than Fs. So if every divine person is a god, then there can’t be fewer gods than divine persons. [...]