<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Swinburne&#8217;s Social Trinitarian Theory, Part 3 &#8211; functional monotheism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trinities.org/blog/archives/168/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/168</link>
	<description>theories about the father, son, and holy spirit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:44:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: trinities - Swinburne&#8217;s Social Trinitarian Theory, Part 5 - Yes, we can prove it by reason alone</title>
		<link>http://trinities.org/blog/archives/168/comment-page-1#comment-57309</link>
		<dc:creator>trinities - Swinburne&#8217;s Social Trinitarian Theory, Part 5 - Yes, we can prove it by reason alone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 03:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trinities.org/blog/archives/168#comment-57309</guid>
		<description>[...] The installment before the last, we saw that Richard Swinburne&#8217;s social trinitarian theory is very carefully built so as to satisfy multiple demands of orthodoxy. There is, he argues, a contradiction-free, reasonable trinitarian theory, which fits well with the classic creeds. But we can do even better than that. In Swinburne&#8217;s view, there&#8217;s a plausible argument for the Trinity based on reason alone. Don&#8217;t believe it? Oh, ye of little faith reason. Have ye not read the earlier Richard on this? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The installment before the last, we saw that Richard Swinburne&#8217;s social trinitarian theory is very carefully built so as to satisfy multiple demands of orthodoxy. There is, he argues, a contradiction-free, reasonable trinitarian theory, which fits well with the classic creeds. But we can do even better than that. In Swinburne&#8217;s view, there&#8217;s a plausible argument for the Trinity based on reason alone. Don&#8217;t believe it? Oh, ye of little faith reason. Have ye not read the earlier Richard on this? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

